“THE British folks have voted to go away the European Union and their will have to be revered.” With these phrases David Cameron acknowledged an consequence that he doubted would materialise: the nation had voted for Brexit. His lip quivering and his spouse at his aspect, he proceeded to announce that he could be stepping down: staying on as a caretaker whereas his occasion holds a management contest to be concluded by the point of its convention in October. No candidates have put their names ahead, however it’s to be anticipated that Boris Johnson and Theresa Might, and doubtless others, will throw their hats into the ring.
The transfer, so arduous to think about simply hours earlier, had turn out to be nigh-on inevitable as, at round 5am, the prime minister’s defeat within the referendum was confirmed. Mr Cameron has spent the previous months touring the nation telling voters {that a} Brexit could be disastrous. He wouldn’t have needed to remain on and make the catastrophe a actuality. And in any case his largely anti-EU members wouldn’t have tolerated him. He needed to go.
The resignation speech, when it got here, was an emotional try and remind the world of the very best of his six-year premiership: with nods to his one-nation reforms, an emphasis on the significance of stability within the coming months and a patriotic peroration about “this nice nation”. It was a touching bid to go away workplace with some scraps of dignity and honour.
It was ineffectual. With stockmarkets round Europe crashing, recriminations whizzing via the ether and the total weight of Britain’s horrible choice to go away the EU looming over them, his achievements in workplace appeared, nevertheless unfairly, puny.
Most unedifying was his try and imbue the referendum consequence, simply some of the ill-conceived and profoundly damaging political occasions of Britain’s post-war historical past, with some the Aristocracy. It had been an important democratic train, the prime minister advised the crowds. It had been vital to reply such a urgent query. The folks had spoken.
To place it kindly, this was a fantasy. Mr Cameron took the reckless choice to pledge to carry a vote (in opposition to the higher knowledge of George Osborne, the chancellor, who can be sure to go) again in 2013. He had not wanted to. The general public was actually not clamouring for one. His motive was to placate his cranky backbenchers. His consideration given to the dangers and realities of such a promise was missing. His understanding of the “renegotiation” of Britain’s EU membership, on which he rested his technique, was cursory at greatest.
The prime minister’s gamble was underwritten by the reassurance that he may deal with it, that his powers of persuasion and credibility (which, to be honest, are appreciable) would save the day. Within the months and years after his 2013 speech, he wasted alternative after alternative to roll the pitch for the referendum; to construct, over time, a sturdy case to remain within the EU. Underneath-advised and overconfident, he turned the renegotiation from an asset to a keep on with which Brexiteers may beat him. His referendum marketing campaign, for all its flashes of ability and conviction, was too little, too late. The entire train was a spectacularly foolhardy act of overreach. The unanticipated consequence shall be a Britain poorer, extra remoted, much less influential and extra divided.
A time will come for reflection on the great in Mr Cameron’s management of the Conservative Get together and his premiership, on his essentially right imaginative and prescient for a one-nation Tory occasion in possession of the centre floor. However it would certainly be dwarfed by this large, nation-changing misstep, one assured to scar the nation for many years and diminish his place within the historical past books. He leaves workplace in ignominy.
Learn extra
All our Brexit protection >>
