Former Vice President Mike Pence may not problem all the subpoenas he faces as a part of the probe into the efforts by his former boss to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 election, based on an interview Sunday.

Pence has claimed he’s protected by a “speech and debate” clause that safeguards congressional officers from giving testimony associated to their jobs, arguing that on Jan. 6, 2021 he was performing in his function as president of the Senate.

However he opened the door to the chance that some facets of the subpoena may not be lined by the “speech and debate” argument.

“We’re not asserting govt privilege, which can embody different discussions,” Pence stated on ABC “This Week.”

“I’ve truly by no means asserted that different issues unrelated to Jan. 6 would in any other case be protected by ‘speech and debate,’” he stated.

After negotiations with Pence’s attorneys, particular counsel Jack Smith issued the subpoena final month as a part of the investigation into the try by former President Donald Trump to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 election.

In this image released in the final report by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, on Thursday, Dec. 22, 2022, Vice President Mike Pence talks on the phone from a secured loading dock at the U.S. Capitol as he looks at another phone with a recording of video statement President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021. (House Select Committee via AP)

In response to ABC Information sources, the subpoena seeks data unrelated to Pence’s function in certifying the election, similar to communications linked to the Jan. 6 rally previous to the assault on the U.S. Capitol and efforts to put in Jeffrey Clark as performing lawyer basic.

Clark was a Trump supporter who expressed willingness to pursue unfounded allegations of voter fraud.

However Pence, who’s believed to be weighing a White Home bid, did insist he’s keen to struggle the subpoena all the way in which to the Supreme Courtroom.

“I’ve directed my attorneys to make a powerful case in protection of my function as president of the Senate presiding over a joint session of Congress on that day,” he stated. “We’ll let the courts type it out.”