Ohio Legal professional Common Dave Yost has seen no indication {that a} 10-year-old lady from his state traveled to Indiana for an abortion, fueling questions in regards to the veracity of a report President Biden cited to spice up his pro-choice agenda.

Mr. Yost mentioned Monday that his workplace has heard “not a whisper” a couple of case involving the rape of a younger Ohio lady, which went viral final week.

The anecdote within the Indianapolis Star cited Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indiana abortion supplier and pro-choice advocate, as its sole supply.

“We work intently with the decentralized law-enforcement system in Ohio, however now we have common contact with prosecutors and native police and sheriffs. Not a whisper anyplace,” the Republican lawyer normal mentioned on the Fox Information Channel present “Jesse Watters Primetime.”

Although native authorities conduct prosecutions, Mr. Yost mentioned his workplace would immediately know of any requests for DNA proof.

“One thing that could be much more telling: My workplace runs the crime lab,” Mr. Yost added. “Any case like this, you’re going to have a rape equipment, you’re going to have organic proof, and also you’d be on the lookout for DNA evaluation, which we do many of the DNA evaluation in Ohio. There isn’t a case request for an evaluation that appears something like this.”

The story got here underneath nationwide scrutiny Friday after Mr. Biden blasted Ohio’s heartbeat legislation, saying a 10-year-old lady shouldn’t be compelled “to offer start to a rapist’s baby,” at a signing ceremony for an govt order increasing abortion entry.

“This isn’t some imagined horror. It’s already taking place. Simply final week, it was reported {that a} 10-year-old lady was a rape sufferer in Ohio — 10 years outdated — and he or she was compelled to must journey out of the state to Indiana to hunt to terminate the being pregnant and possibly save her life,” Mr. Biden mentioned.

The White Home has declined to supply backup for the declare. As well as, two left-tilting fact-checking websites, Snopes and the Washington Publish fact-checker have been unable thus far to confirm the report.

Dr. Bernard informed the IndyStar that she obtained a name from an Ohio colleague a couple of 10-year-old affected person who was unable to acquire an abortion within the Buckeye State as a result of she was six weeks and three days pregnant.

The decision reportedly got here just a few days after the Supreme Court docket’s June 24 determination overturning Roe v. Wade, which positioned the states again accountable for abortion lawmaking.

“However for now, the process nonetheless is authorized right here,” mentioned the July 1 article within the IndyStar. “And so the lady quickly was on her method to Indiana to Bernard’s care.”

Ohio’s heartbeat legislation bans most abortions after a fetal heartbeat will be detected, which is often six to eight weeks’ gestation. 

However the statute doesn’t specify six weeks, in a approach that will make “six weeks and three days” a authorized drawback and likewise permits exceptions for medical emergencies — particulars that Mr. Yost mentioned solid doubt on the story.

“Ohio’s heartbeat legislation has a medical emergency exception broader than simply the lifetime of the mom,” Mr. Yost mentioned. “This younger lady, if she exists and if this horrible factor really occurred to her — it breaks my coronary heart to consider it — she didn’t have to depart Ohio to search out remedy.”

Mr. Yost additionally mentioned that it will be against the law in Ohio to fail to report the rape of a kid.

“Now the physician in Indiana isn’t in our jurisdiction, clearly. We don’t know who the originating physician in Ohio was, in the event that they even exist,” Mr. Yost mentioned. “However the backside line is it’s a crime should you’re a mandated reporter to fail to report.”

He additionally mentioned that in Ohio, “the rape of a 10-year-old means life in jail.”

“I do know our prosecutors and cops on this state,” Mr. Yost mentioned. “There’s not a one in all them that wouldn’t be turning over each rock of their jurisdiction if there was the slightest trace that this occurred there.”

Dr. Bernard, who could be a mandated reporter underneath Indiana legislation, declined to supply extra info on the case.

IndyStar govt editor Bro Krift stood by the story in an announcement via a Gannett spokesperson, in accordance with the Publish fact-checker.

“The details and sourcing about folks crossing state strains into Indiana, together with the 10-year-old lady, for abortions are clear. We’ve no extra remark at the moment,” Mr. Krift mentioned.