The Supreme Court docket will quickly hear arguments about using racial preferences in faculty admissions. On this rating, a curious divergence in opinion has arisen in recent times. Whereas the general public has moved sharply in a single path, academia has raced within the precise reverse.
Take California. In 1996 Californians voted by a 9-point margin to approve Proposition 209, a constitutional modification to ban using racial preferences in public employment and faculty admissions. Because the state’s citizens moved to the left within the subsequent years, it was extensively assumed that help for the ban had evaporated. The College of California evidently felt certain by the letter however not the spirit of the legislation, because the system diminished its reliance on goal take a look at scores in order that it may use “holistic” judgments, successfully making it simpler to cover its use of racial preferences.
